Scott Panetti v. William Stephens, Director

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining Edwards is best read as “allowing the [court] to insist on counsel” for someone who satisfies the Dusky standard, “but not requiring that the [court] do so”
• “Edwards is permissive, allowing the state to insist on counsel, but not requiring that the state do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).