United States v. Joshua Stafford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding trial court’s determination that the defendant was competent to stand trial and proceed pro se despite a “litany of mental health issues”
• “Edwards permitted—but did not require—courts to impose counsel on defendants with mental issues who are nonetheless competent to stand trial.”
• “The 11 Supreme Court in Edwards permitted – but did not require – courts to impose counsel on defendants with mental issues who are nonetheless competent to stand trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).