Earley v. Landsidle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen the language in a statute is clear and unambiguous, the courts are bound by the plain meaning of that language.”
• “[W]hen the language in a statute is clear and unambiguous, the courts are bound by the plain meaning of that language.”
• “The legislature’s intent must be determined from the words used, unless a literal construction of the statute would yield an absurd result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).