State v. Finkelstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “ [discretion in regulating and controlling the business of the court is necessarily confided in the judge, and this court should never interfere with its exercise unless it is made to appear that wrong or oppression has resulted from its abuse”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-10· cited 24×
• Lee v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-04-18· cited 15×
• Schuman v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-10-11· cited 10×
• State v. Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-08-22· cited 3×
• State v. Schuman
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-04-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tuzman
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-03-10· cited 38×
• Simpkins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-04-12· cited 30×
• Reynolds v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-09-25· cited 29×
• Carr v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1886-04-06· cited 29×
• State v. Brannon
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-04-08· cited 20×
• Poole v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1959-09-21· cited 12×