Federal Claims· 2/10/1994

Schuerman v. United States

Citations

30 Fed. Cl. 420
1994 U.S. Claims LEXIS 32
1994 WL 48468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting second prong of Baudier test as inapplicable unless members of general public bring suit against promisors who contract with Government to render public service
delimiting analysis of third-party beneficiary status when alleged contract with Government is for private rather than public benefit
rejecting the second prong of the Baudier test as inapplicable unless members of the general public bring suit against promisors who contract with the Government to render a public service
reviewing Court of Claims third party beneficiary cases and noting that “[t]he court carefully must distinguish between incidental and indirect beneficiaries and direct beneficiaries, only the latter of which qualify for third-party beneficiary status.”
limiting the two-party Baudier test to its first prong: the “intention-to-benefit” test
“For purposes of determining whether a party qualifies as a third-party beneficiary, a court should focus its inquiry upon only the first prong * * *.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nettesheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.