· 8/2/1983
The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Citations
- 713 F.2d 1541
- 31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,374
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 13643
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing “the well-entrenched rule that a subcontractor cannot bring a direct appeal against the government”
- the court must give meaning to each part of a contract and interpret the contract as a whole
- when plaintiff is both a' subcontractor-not-in-privity and a prime contractor-in-privity with the United States, only its claims arising from contractual privity fall within CDA
- “In subsequent cases, the application of the Severin doctrine has been narrowly construed.”
- discussing legislative history and purpose of the CDA
- involving appeal from this Board
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Markey, Cowen, Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.