Skip to main content
· 8/2/1983

The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Citations

  • 713 F.2d 1541
  • 31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,374
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 13643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing “the well-entrenched rule that a subcontractor cannot bring a direct appeal against the government”
  • the court must give meaning to each part of a contract and interpret the contract as a whole
  • when plaintiff is both a' subcontractor-not-in-privity and a prime contractor-in-privity with the United States, only its claims arising from contractual privity fall within CDA
  • “In subsequent cases, the application of the Severin doctrine has been narrowly construed.”
  • discussing legislative history and purpose of the CDA
  • involving appeal from this Board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Cowen, Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.