Graffius v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that whether federal employer denied accommodation request is a factual question
• granting summary judgment to the defendant because the plaintiff “provide[d] no evidence that she provided the [employer] with any medical documentation of her condition in support of her accommodation requests”
• denying motion for summary judgment where parties disagreed over the need for plaintiff to be present in the office in response to her request to telecommute
• granting summary judgment to the defendant because the plaintiff “provide[d] no evidence that she provided the [employer] with any medical documentation of her condition in support of her accommodation requests”
• “Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 791, is the exclusive remedy for federal employees alleging that federal agencies engaged in disability discrimination.”
• Under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, “[a]n accommodation is ‘reasonable’ if it allows the employee to fulfill all essential functions of her job without imposing an undue hardship on the employer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).