Ellison v. Napolitano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that employee could use prior, unexhausted discrimination claims as background evidence in support of a timely claim
• concluding that employee could use prior, unexhausted discrimination claims as background evidence in support of a timely claim
• dismissing claims ‘for failure, to exhaust in a timely manner 1 where the plaintiff ‘did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor within 45 days of their alleged occurrences 1
• “[Requests for accommodation may constitute protected activity and therefore ... allegations regarding those requests may support ... claims of retaliation .... ”
• “Because untimely exhaustion of [Title VII] administrative remedies is an affirmative defense, the defendant bears the burden of pleading and proving it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).