Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party is aggrieved when the party has been adversely affected by the decision from which the appeal is taken
• holding that an appeal must be quashed when it is filed by a party that is “not ‘aggrieved’ and therefore, does not have standing to appeal”
• holding that an appeal must be quashed when it is filed by a party that is “not ‘aggrieved’ and therefore, does not have standing to appeal”
• ruling there was no error excluding evidence that was “based upon second-hand information or mere speculation”
• declining to reach issue of whether agreement that released liability for gross negligence would violate public policy where agreement in question stated only “negligence”
• “where the evidence proposed goes to the impeachment of his opponent’s witness, it is admissible as a matter of right.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).