Skip to main content
· 8/12/2011

Wiggins v. Synthes (U.S.A.)

Citations

  • 29 A.3d 9
  • 2011 Pa. Super. 172
  • 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2229
  • 2011 WL 3524286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • patient was not required to present testimony that orthopedic screws were defective under the malfunction theory as the jury could infer the existence of a defect from circumstantial evidence that they broke

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Allen, Freedberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.