Krepps, F. v. Snyder, K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party’s failure to specifically and contemporaneously object to an instruction prior to deliberations constituted a waiver of the issue
• affirming denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the merits in appeal from judgment following trial
• explaining that “the trial court [did not err] when it applied Rule 126 to override Rule 4014(b)'s thirty-day response time” because Pa.R.C.P. 4014(b) expressly “permits the court to extend the time for parties to respond to requests for admissions.”
• affirming denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the merits in appeal from judgment following trial
• affirming denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the merits in appeal from judgment following trial
• reviewing 6 An unusual procedural posture caused this Court to distinguish Whitaker and Xtreme Caged Combat in Yoder v. McCarthy Constr., Inc., 291 A.3d 1 (Pa.Super. 2023), appeal granted, 318 A.3d 757 (Pa. 2024

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).