Court of Appeals of Texas· 8/12/1999
Schenekl v. State
Citations
- 996 S.W.2d 305
- 1999 WL 374216
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[tjhough appellant has established, and the State has failed to rebut, the anxiety element, it is not enough to cause the prejudice prong to weigh in appellant’s favor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cayce, Brigham, Holman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Zamorano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-11· cited 502×
- Schenekl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-10-25· cited 44×
- Marquez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-04-21· cited 35×
- Kelly v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-11-25· cited 6×
- Peruzzi v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2002-07-15· cited 5×
- Kenneth Dwain Adkins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-03-24
- Keith E. Wilder v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-09-22
- Jerry Frank Haas Ivy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-06-06
- Carlos Kelly v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-08-21
- in the Matter of J. M. , III, a ChildTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-08-11
- State v. Rolando PenaTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-10-05
- Adrian Nathan Salazar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-03-31
- Adrian Quigley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2017-03-09
- State v. Thomas Hughes PageTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2020-04-17
- Com. of PA v. F.W. KarashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-02-06
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 1,645×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,072×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-22· cited 568×
- Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court· 1997-04-15· cited 524×
- Emery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-05-11· cited 456×
- United States v. Villamonte-MarquezSupreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 415×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.