Skip to main content
· 9/30/2005

In Re the Marriage of Nickels

Citations

  • 834 N.E.2d 1091
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 1802
  • 2005 WL 2401114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “while a trial court may set aside to one party the value of a marital asset where the other party made no contribution to its acquisition, it is not required to do so”
  • noting that pension benefits are marital property if the benefits are not forfeited at the termination of employment, or the benefits are vested and payable before or after the dissolution
  • “Thus, in order for pension benefits to be included as marital property, the benefits must not be forfeited at the termination of employment or the benefits must be vested and payable either before or after the dissolution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Darden, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.