David Gregory Landeck v. Commonwealth of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving a proposed instruction rather than a mere request for clarification
• “If the evidence demonstrates that, during this interval, ‘the accused reflected or deliberated . . . [or had] reasonable time or opportunity for cooling, then the wounding is attributable to malice and not heat of passion.’” (quoting Miller v. Commonwealth, 5 Va. App. 22, 25 (1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).