Albert v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence established possession of contraband that was near “his wallet, identification papers and a bottle of prescribed medicine bearing his name”
• holding that the evidence established that the defendant possessed contraband that was near “his wallet, identification papers and a bottle of prescribed medicine bearing his name”
• holding that the evidence established that the defendant possessed contraband that was near “his wallet, identification papers and a bottle of prescribed medicine bearing his name”
• holding that the evidence established that the defendant possessed contraband that was near “his wallet, -7- identification papers and a bottle of prescribed medicine bearing his name”
• finding a defendant consciously exercised dominion and control over drugs found in a briefcase near his bed that contained his identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).