Skip to main content

Sanneman v. Chrysler Corp.

Citations

  • 191 F.R.D. 441
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2738
  • 2000 WL 257452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • blending the issue of ascertainability with class definition and cross- referencing a later discussion on predominance and superiority
  • finding typicality when named plaintiff and class members all claimed to have been injured by car manufacturer’s failure to disclose a latent defect
  • finding used car owner to be an inadequate representative of a class that—by definition—was comprised solely of new car owners
  • denied class certification because proposed class definition made it “impossible to definitively identify class members prior to individualized fact-finding and litigation”
  • finding class action not superior because the case was unmanageable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Antwerpen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.