Sudomir v. McMahon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To so hold would amount to compelling the states to adopt each and every more generous classification which, on its face, is not irrational”
• “To so hold would amount to compelling the states to adopt each and every more generous classification which, on its face, is not irrational.”
• “To so hold would amount to compelling the states to adopt each and every more generous classification which, on its face, is not irrational.”
• “The defendants respond by asserting that it is not necessary to make such a showing [under strict scrutiny] because California has merely adopted a federal classification which is subject only to the rational basis standard of review”
• with respect to asylum applicants who enter or remain in the United States illegally and then apply for asylum, “[t]heir presence is tolerated during the period necessary to process their applications” but “it has not been legitimated by any affirmative act”
• federal classifications valid unless wholly irrational

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-05-22· cited 368×
• Maria Isabel Gonzalez De Martinez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-07-02· cited 202×
• Monica Navarro Pimentel v Susan Dreyfus
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-29· cited 149×
• Jorge Alberto Hernandez-Mezquita v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-06-20· cited 149×
• Galyna Semienovna Halaim and Mariya Semienovna Halaim v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-02-18· cited 117×
• Christopher John Dillingham v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-14· cited 83×
• Roberta Charmaine Garberding v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-07-27· cited 82×
• Bruns v. Mayhew
  First Circuit· 2014-04-28· cited 56×
• United States v. Lopez-Flores
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-08-10· cited 47×
• Juana Cerpa Mendoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-02-07· cited 36×
• Mashiri v. Department of Education
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-03-14· cited 34×
• Abreu v. Callahan
  S.D. New York· 1997-07-24· cited 25×
• WESTERN MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-03-03· cited 24×
• Thomas v. Lynch
  First Circuit· 2016-07-05· cited 19×
• Doe v. Commissioner of Transitional Assistance
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-08-15· cited 19×
• Diaz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  E.D. California· 1986-09-26· cited 17×
• Korab v. Fink
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-04-01· cited 17×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-09-18· cited 16×
• Industrial Commission v. Arteaga
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-04-06· cited 15×
• Division of Employment & Training v. Turynski
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-04-06· cited 14×

Other cases named Sudomir v. McMahon

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Sudomir v. Mcmahon
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-08-12