Skip to main content

Jafarzadeh v. Duke

Citations

  • 270 F. Supp. 3d 296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing mandamus claim “because plaintiffs are able to assert the same claim through the APA”
  • dismissing mandamus claim “because plaintiffs are able to assert the same claim through the APA”
  • dismissing an ultra vires claim because a plaintiff able to assert a claim under the APA “cannot obtain relief . . . through the Court’s inherent power to review ultra vires agency actions”
  • “The twin doctrines of mootness and ripeness can be described as ‘standing set in a time frame: The requisite personal interest that must exist at the commencement of litigation 5 (standing) must continue throughout its existence (mootness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jafarzadeh v. Duke

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.