Robinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court properly adjudicated defendant guilty of petit theft, rather than grand theft, where state “made [no] effort of showing that it could not ‘satisfactorily ascertain’ the market value of the smoke detectors removed from the walls”
• holding that trial court properly adjudicated defendant guilty of petit theft, rather than grand theft, where state \made [no] effort of showing that it could not `satisfactorily ascertain' the market value of the smoke detectors removed from the walls\
• “It is well settled that proof of the element of value is essential to a conviction for grand theft and must be established by the state beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sanchez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-09· cited 15×
• A.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-24· cited 10×
• E.G., a child v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-09· cited 2×
• Ellison v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-07· cited 2×
• Jacobs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-02
• Mills v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-21
• J.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Negron v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-11-13· cited 117×
• Cofield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-09· cited 16×
• Interest of J.R.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-08· cited 8×
• M.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-26· cited 7×