Skip to main content

C.B. v. State

Citations

  • 721 So. 2d 785
  • 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15516
  • 1998 WL 870837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that damage to the property of another is an essential element of the offense of criminal mischief
  • holding that although an order is not styled as such, its language “is nevertheless injunctive and must comply with the requirements for issuance of an injunction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, Shevin, Sorondo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.