Massachusetts Appeals Court· 9/29/1980
Salem Realty Co. v. Matera
Citations
- 410 N.E.2d 716
- 10 Mass. App. Ct. 571
- 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing unfairness of forcing client to choose between adherence to a lawyer in whom he lost faith or risking more fees
- “In applying a quantum meruit standard, the terms of the abrogated [contingent] fee agreement provide helpful guidance . . .”
- \the right of a client to [change lawyers] has not much value if the client is put at risk to pay the full contract price for services not rendered and to pay a second lawyer as well\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodman, Dreben, Kass
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.