Massachusetts Appeals Court· 9/29/1980
Salem Realty Co. v. Matera
Citations
- 410 N.E.2d 716
- 10 Mass. App. Ct. 571
- 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing unfairness of forcing client to choose between adherence to a lawyer in whom he lost faith or risking more fees
- “In applying a quantum meruit standard, the terms of the abrogated [contingent] fee agreement provide helpful guidance . . .”
- \the right of a client to [change lawyers] has not much value if the client is put at risk to pay the full contract price for services not rendered and to pay a second lawyer as well\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodman, Dreben, Kass
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zabin v. PicciottoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-11-18· cited 73×
- Allen v. BatchelderMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1984-01-27· cited 65×
- Mulhern v. RoachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-07-10· cited 52×
- Liss v. StudenyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-01-23· cited 50×
- Beatty v. NP CORP.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-12-03· cited 49×
- Malonis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-10-18· cited 36×
- Salem Realty Co. v. MateraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-10-08· cited 33×
- Clean Harbors, Inc. v. John Hancock Life InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2005-08-29· cited 23×
- Phelps Steel, Inc. v. Von DeakMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-08-06· cited 20×
- Bird v. BirdMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-06-22· cited 20×
- LoCicero v. Hartford Insurance GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-02-01· cited 19×
- Olmstead v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-03-03· cited 18×
- Smith v. ConsalvoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-08-22· cited 15×
- In Re AlbertD. Massachusetts· 1997-03-31· cited 14×
- Smith v. BinderMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-05-02· cited 14×
- Adkin Plumbing & Heating Supply Co. v. HarwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-04-24· cited 13×
- Grimes v. Perkins School for the BlindMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-06-24· cited 9×
- Minkina v. FranklMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-09-15· cited 9×
- In re the Discipline of an AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-04-11· cited 7×
- Hardman v. SnyderWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-05-18· cited 6×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-03-10· cited 260×
- Cummings v. National Shawmut Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1933-12-27· cited 137×
- Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-01-26· cited 109×
- Covich v. ChambersMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-11-27· cited 77×
- First National Bank of Boston v. BrinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-03-29· cited 74×
- Glenn Acres, Inc. v. Cliffwood Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1967-07-12· cited 42×
- McInerney v. Massasoit Greyhound Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-04-20· cited 40×
- Elbaum v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1962-07-02· cited 22×
- Muldoon v. West End Chevrolet, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1958-11-12· cited 22×
- Walsh v. O'NEILLMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1966-04-13· cited 15×
- Snow v. MikenasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-12-07· cited 14×
- Duggan v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-12-16· cited 14×
- Abrams v. LoewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1956-12-03· cited 12×
- Perkins v. BlakeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1975-08-11· cited 11×
- Cameron v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-03-08· cited 11×
Other cases named Salem Realty Co. v. Matera
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.