Skip to main content

Minkina v. Frankl

Citations

  • 86 Mass. App. Ct. 282
  • 16 N.E.3d 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Warfield “directly overruled [the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s] rejection of the requirement of a specific reference to discrimination claims”
  • “[I]t is not malpractice to fail to advocate for or anticipate a substantial change in law requiring the overruling of a controlling precedent”
  • court properly struck expert opinion as speculative
  • expert opinion properly struck as speculative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cypher, Kafker, Hanlon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Minkina v. Frankl

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.