Skip to main content

Bird v. Bird

Citations

  • 509 N.E.2d 289
  • 24 Mass. App. Ct. 362
  • 1987 Mass. App. LEXIS 2006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating standard for compliance with Mass. R. Civ. R 11, 365 Mass. 753 [1974]
  • rejecting analogy between “successful party” under contractual attorney’s fee clause and “prevailing party” under the Federal civil rights provision
  • abuse of discretion standard employed in determining whether rule 11 sanctions were warranted
  • an offer of judgment may be made by a plaintiff defending a counterclaim
  • determining \successful party\ on a comparative basis
  • determining “successful party” on a comparative basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Kaplan, Kass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.