Walsh v. O'NEILL

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining “to extend to the attorney client relationship the principle that interference with an existing business relationship, if malicious or without justification, is actionable [where] the relationship is not founded in a contract”
• attorney’s interference claim founded on improper motive of successor counsel was precluded on policy grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).