Skip to main content

Salazar v. State

Citations

  • 559 P.2d 66
  • 1976 Alas. LEXIS 363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[w]hen ... the defendant’s right to confront effectively the witnesses against him by exploring their possible bias or prejudice is balanced against a rule based solely on policy grounds, the defendant’s constitutional rights must prevail”
  • noting that the confidential marital communications privilege “is meant to protect those communications arising between the partners of a marital relationship that are confidential and not as a privilege for all communications”
  • “when conflict is found between the constitutional right of confrontation and the exercise of a privilege based on public policy, the constitutional right must control”
  • Sixth Amendment overrides the common law privilege for confidential marital communications where defendant seeks to introduce the testimony of the witness’s wife to the effect that the witness had himself confessed to the crime
  • Sixth Amendment right overrides the marital privilege
  • guidelines for granting a continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Rabi-Nowitz, Connor, Erwin, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.