Alaska Supreme Court· 12/17/1976
Salazar v. State
Citations
- 559 P.2d 66
- 1976 Alas. LEXIS 363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[w]hen ... the defendant’s right to confront effectively the witnesses against him by exploring their possible bias or prejudice is balanced against a rule based solely on policy grounds, the defendant’s constitutional rights must prevail”
- noting that the confidential marital communications privilege “is meant to protect those communications arising between the partners of a marital relationship that are confidential and not as a privilege for all communications”
- “when conflict is found between the constitutional right of confrontation and the exercise of a privilege based on public policy, the constitutional right must control”
- Sixth Amendment overrides the common law privilege for confidential marital communications where defendant seeks to introduce the testimony of the witness’s wife to the effect that the witness had himself confessed to the crime
- Sixth Amendment right overrides the marital privilege
- guidelines for granting a continuance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boochever, Rabi-Nowitz, Connor, Erwin, Burke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. FoskeyIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 253×
- Lora v. Board of EducationE.D. New York· 1977-05-12· cited 104×
- Braham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-11-10· cited 97×
- People v. FoggyIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 57×
- United States v. J. Marshall BrownFifth Circuit· 1981-03-05· cited 54×
- State v. PesetiHawaii Supreme Court· 2003-02-27· cited 49×
- Greenway v. HeathcottAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-02-15· cited 46×
- Burke v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-10-24· cited 46×
- Evans v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-05-21· cited 31×
- State v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court· 1985-12-09· cited 30×
- People v. KnightAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-12-12· cited 28×
- Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1977-01-22· cited 27×
- McKinney v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-11-04· cited 25×
- Salazar v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-04-06· cited 22×
- Keel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-04-18· cited 22×
- Carlson v. BMW Industrial Service, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1987-11-10· cited 21×
- Lindley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 19×
- Nielsen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-02-06· cited 17×
- Best v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-12-27· cited 14×
- Balentine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-10-17· cited 14×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 272×
- People v. FoyNew York Court of Appeals· 1973-06-07· cited 192×
- Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-01-15· cited 181×
- Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-06-16· cited 180×
- The People v. SolomonIllinois Supreme Court· 1962-05-25· cited 149×
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-07-09· cited 119×
- Davis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1972-07-28· cited 70×
- Sloan v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyAlaska Supreme Court· 1975-10-15· cited 56×
- Burleson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1975-12-22· cited 54×
- Klockenbrink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-07-31· cited 50×
- Mead v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1968-09-23· cited 29×
- Lovelady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1970-12-16· cited 13×
- People v. BuckeyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-02-24· cited 12×
- Sullivan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1973-05-04· cited 8×
- People v. StreetAppellate Court of Illinois· 1971-06-18· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.