Alaska Supreme Court· 10/24/1980
Burke v. State
Citations
- 624 P.2d 1240
- 1980 Alas. LEXIS 729
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding instruction “unduly emphasized” victim’s testimony without “similarly indicating that other witnesses’ testimony need not be corroborated”
- rejecting an instruction based upon Lord Hale’s dictum that rape is easy to charge and difficult to disprove
- cautioning against long-term inactivity or a pattern of lack of prompt investigations
- evidence of prior sexual acts with the same victim may be admissible to prove elements of a sexual assault case
- evidence of prior sexual acts with the same victim may be admissible to prove elements of a sexual assault case
- evidence of prior sex crimes admissible as background information to explain victim's testimony in context and to provide fact finder with probative information of an ongoing relationship between the accused and the victim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Con-Nor, Boochever, Burke, Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 364×
- Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-07-26· cited 96×
- State v. FerreroArizona Supreme Court· 2012-04-11· cited 91×
- State v. CraigNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-01-11· cited 72×
- Surina v. BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-04-06· cited 42×
- State v. MelcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-05-08· cited 40×
- Moor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-11-08· cited 37×
- Soper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-01-23· cited 26×
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-06-07· cited 21×
- Nathaniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-09-02· cited 19×
- State v. GrossNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-05-23· cited 18×
- Velez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-10-07· cited 17×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-10-08· cited 16×
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-04-13· cited 16×
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-01-03· cited 13×
- York v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-06-10· cited 12×
- Goulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-01-14· cited 12×
- State v. DeverCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2022-03-17· cited 11×
- Kailukiak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-05-08· cited 10×
- Bolden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-06-27· cited 10×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 2,170×
- People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-07-31· cited 246×
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-01-16· cited 147×
- Marks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1972-04-21· cited 144×
- Rabinovitch v. NyquistSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 131×
- Frink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-06-29· cited 121×
- Evans v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 112×
- State v. SmootIdaho Supreme Court· 1978-11-22· cited 92×
- P. H. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1972-12-29· cited 89×
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-11-29· cited 85×
- State v. JerousekArizona Supreme Court· 1979-02-06· cited 76×
- State v. BerryArizona Supreme Court· 1966-10-19· cited 74×
- Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-10-10· cited 71×
- State v. TreadawayArizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-11· cited 68×
- People v. CovertCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-03-02· cited 66×
- People v. SylviaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-05-10· cited 66×
- State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-05-25· cited 63×
- Tarnef v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1973-07-25· cited 61×
- State v. KristichOregon Supreme Court· 1961-03-01· cited 60×
- State v. MinnsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-04-04· cited 59×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.