Skip to main content

Burke v. State

Citations

  • 624 P.2d 1240
  • 1980 Alas. LEXIS 729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding instruction “unduly emphasized” victim’s testimony without “similarly indicating that other witnesses’ testimony need not be corroborated”
  • rejecting an instruction based upon Lord Hale’s dictum that rape is easy to charge and difficult to disprove
  • cautioning against long-term inactivity or a pattern of lack of prompt investigations
  • evidence of prior sexual acts with the same victim may be admissible to prove elements of a sexual assault case
  • evidence of prior sexual acts with the same victim may be admissible to prove elements of a sexual assault case
  • evidence of prior sex crimes admissible as background information to explain victim's testimony in context and to provide fact finder with probative information of an ongoing relationship between the accused and the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Con-Nor, Boochever, Burke, Matthews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.