Utah Supreme Court· 12/9/1985

State v. Williams

Citations

712 P.2d 220
1985 Utah LEXIS 980

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

acknowledging that trial court has discretion in granting or denying motions for new trials in criminal cases
affirming the denial of a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence where the \evidence . . . was available to defendant but not obtained by him\ or through due diligence could have been discovered prior to the time of trial
“[T]he granting of a continuance is discretionary with the trial judge[; thus, ajbsent an abuse of that discretion, the decision [of the trial court] will not be reversed by this [c]ourt.”
where victim testified that he did not know defendant or have any reason to pay him any money, reasonable inference was that defendant knew check was forged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howe, Hall, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.