Klockenbrink v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Stovall, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199
• denial of continuance an abuse of discretion where counsel given only five days to prepare for trial and important witness could not be located until after trial
• “It is unquestionable that the right to the assistance of counsel of necessity includes the concommitant [sic] right to have a reasonable time in which to prepare for trial.”
• trial court has broad discretion in determining whether to grant a continu-anee
• continuance required if counsel has had inadequate time to prepare

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).