Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 11/4/1988

Salahuddin v. Cuomo

Citations

  • 861 F.2d 40
  • 12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 915
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14981

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that court may dismiss a complaint when it does not comply with requirements of Rule 8
  • concluding that 15-page single-spaced complaint naming “20-odd defendants” and “contain[ing] a surfeit of detail” failed to comply with Rule 8’s “short and plain statement” requirement
  • holding that district courts generally should grant a self-represented plaintiff an opportunity to amend a complaint to cure its defects, unless amendment would be futile
  • holding that district courts generally grant a pro se plaintiff an opportunity to amend a complaint to cure its defects
  • suggesting that courts may simply strike redundant or immaterial matter, leaving the facially valid claims to be litigated
  • suggesting that if future amended complaint failed to comply with Rule 8, court could simply strike redundant or scandalous matter, leaving the non-frivolous claims to be litigated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.