Edwin F. Gordon, Cross-Appellee v. E. G. Green, Gustave T. Broberg, Jr., Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiff’s 180-page complaint because “the operative complaint [was] far too lengthy and repetitious”
• dismissing the plaintiff’s 180-page complaint because “the operative complaint [was] far too lengthy and repetitious”
• considering an eighteen (18) volume pleading in excess of 4,000 pages not short within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)
• expressing the view that overlong complaints full of extraneous or improper allegations should not be tolerated and collecting cases in support
• filing of an amended complaint following an involuntary dismissal without prejudice of an original complaint relates back to the original filing date
• urging district courts to dismiss complaints that are verbose, scandalous, or unintelligible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).