Scheidelman v. Henderson (In Re Henderson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiffs’ allegations were not actionable under section 523(a)(6) where they were based on contractor’s “negligence and sub-par performance during construction at their home”
• holding that a knowing diversion of trust funds for personal use constituted acting in a fiduciary capacity under Section 523(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code
• recognizing that a §523(a) analysis begins with recognition of the general rule that debts and liabilities based solely upon a breach of contract are not excepted from discharge
• recognizing that a §523(a) analysis begins with recognition of the general rule that debts and liabilities based solely upon a breach of contract are not excepted from discharge
• noting that objections to discharge under § 727(a)(4)(B) generally involve the scheduling of non-existent debts, the scheduling of inflated debts, or the filing by the debtor of a false proof of claim
• noting that objections to discharge under § 727(a)(4)(B) generally involve the scheduling of non-existent debts, the scheduling of inflated debts, or the filing by the debtor of a false proof of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).