Cooper v. Pate
Citations
- 378 U.S. 546
- 84 S. Ct. 1733
- 12 L. Ed. 2d 1030
- 1964 U.S. LEXIS 832
About this case
Cooper v. Pate
Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court ruled for the first time that state prison inmates have the standing to sue in federal court to address their grievances under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 . This case followed _Jones v. Cunningham _ (1963) allowing prison inmates to employ a writ of habeas corpus to challenge the legality of their sentencing and the conditions of their imprisonment.[1]
English Wikisource has original text related to this article:
**Cooper v. Pate **
Contents
Background
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_v._Pate&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Background")
The petitioner, an inmate at the Illinois State Prison , brought a writ of certiorari alleging that solely because he was a Black Muslim he was denied permission to buy religious publications and also denied other privileges accorded other prisoners. The District Court had granted the respondent's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted. The Court of Appeals affirmed.[2]
Opinion of the Court
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_v._Pate&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Opinion of the Court")
The Supreme Court reversed the judgment, stating the lower courts were in error to dismiss the stated cause of action as the petitioner is entitled to have his case heard on its merits.[2]
Significance
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_v._Pate&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: Significance")
This case made clear that prison authorities must do whatever is within their ability to treat individuals of every religious group equally, unless they can demonstrate good reasons to do otherwise.[3]
See also
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_v._Pate&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: See also")
References
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_v._Pate&action=edit§ion=5 "Edit section: References")
- ↑ "Prisoner Rights, Litigation, and Correctional Law" . Archived from the original on December 16, 2007. Retrieved December 10, 2007.
- 1 2 Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964).
- ↑ "Religion in Corrections - Legal issues" . Archived from the original on May 19, 2006. Retrieved December 10, 2007.
Further reading
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_v._Pate&action=edit§ion=6 "Edit section: Further reading")
- Smith, Christopher E. (1993). "Black Muslims and the Development of Prisoners' Rights". Journal of Black Studies. 24 (2): 131–146. doi :10.1177/002193479302400201 . JSTOR 2784648 . S2CID 143983168 .
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_v._Pate&action=edit§ion=7 "Edit section: External links")
Text of Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress
The Religious Justice and Law Religious Liberty Archive Archived May 25, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_v._Pate&oldid=1330671664 "
Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing dismissal of § 1983 claim challenging discrimination on the basis of prisoner’s religious beliefs
- solely because of religious beliefs, prisoner had been denied permission to purchase certain religious publications and had been denied other privileges enjoyed by fellow prisoners
- inmate's right to purchase religious publications
- inmate’s right to purchase religious publications
- dissenting opinion of Goldberg, J.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
370 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
- Howard v. KingFifth Circuit· 1983-06-16· cited 2,974×
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 2,909×
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court· 1972-03-20· cited 2,756×
- Salahuddin v. CuomoSecond Circuit· 1988-11-04· cited 2,134×
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 1,006×
- Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 728×
- Gregory Branum v. Clifford Clark, David Hanson, Paul Szarmach, George Stein, and Ross GeogheganSecond Circuit· 1991-03-11· cited 559×
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Third Circuit· 1977-07-21· cited 553×
- Sostre v. McGinnisSecond Circuit· 1971-02-24· cited 512×
- Bankers Trust Company v. Daniel Rhoades, Herman Soifer and Milton BratenSecond Circuit· 1988-10-03· cited 425×
- Jackson v. BishopEighth Circuit· 1968-12-09· cited 392×
- McCarthy v. BronsonSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 373×
- David R. Ferranti v. John J. MoranFirst Circuit· 1980-04-18· cited 372×
- Jack Gittlemacker v. Arthur T. Prasse, Commissioner of Prisons of Pa. And Frank C. Johnston, Warden, State Correctional Institution, Dallas, PaThird Circuit· 1970-06-12· cited 358×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Cooper v. Pate
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.