Sakaria v. Trans World Airlines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “proceeding pro se is not a rare and exceptional 9 circumstance because it is typical of those bringing a § 2254 claim.”
• ruling that applicable term “‘accident’ refers to the cause of injury rather than the injury itself”
• finding that the district court properly did not consider inadmissible hearsay in an affidavit filed with motion for summary judgment
• finding that the district court properly did not consider inadmissible hearsay in an affidavit filed with motion for summary judgment
• finding that the district court properly did not consider inadmissible hearsay in an affidavit filed with motion for summary judgment
• finding that the district court properly did not consider inadmissible hearsay in an affidavit filed with motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Sakaria v. Trans World Airlines

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Sakaria v. Trans World Airlines
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 1×