· 8/31/1994
Cray Communications, Inc., Formerly Known as Dowty Communications, Incorporated v. Novatel Computer Systems, Inc.
Citations
- 33 F.3d 390
- 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 233
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23779
- 1994 WL 467675
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court was “well within its discretion in refusing to ferret out the facts that counsel had not bothered to excavate”
- holding that the district court was “well within its discretion in refusing to ferret out the facts that counsel had not bothered to excavate”
- noting that the Court did not have to “ferret out the facts that counsel had not bothered to excavate”
- noting that the district court is “well within its discretion in refusing to ferret out the facts that counsel ha[s] not bothered to excavate”
- noting that there is no absolute requirement that a ruling on a summary motion be preceded by a hearing
- noting that a district court would be “well within its discretion in refusing to ferret out the facts that counsel had not bothered to excavate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murnaghan, Niemeyer, Erwin, Middle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.