Skip to main content
· 8/31/1994

Cray Communications, Inc., Formerly Known as Dowty Communications, Incorporated v. Novatel Computer Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 33 F.3d 390
  • 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 233
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23779
  • 1994 WL 467675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court was “well within its discretion in refusing to ferret out the facts that counsel had not bothered to excavate”
  • holding that the district court was “well within its discretion in refusing to ferret out the facts that counsel had not bothered to excavate”
  • noting that the Court did not have to “ferret out the facts that counsel had not bothered to excavate”
  • noting that the district court is “well within its discretion in refusing to ferret out the facts that counsel ha[s] not bothered to excavate”
  • noting that there is no absolute requirement that a ruling on a summary motion be preceded by a hearing
  • noting that a district court would be “well within its discretion in refusing to ferret out the facts that counsel had not bothered to excavate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murnaghan, Niemeyer, Erwin, Middle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.