S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that first determination is whether one is “worker” under ORS 656.005(28)
• stating that, when faced with a choice of an interpretation that renders wording redundant and an interpretation that requires the court to omit what has been included in a statute, the court chooses the former
• stating that, when faced with a choice of an interpretation that renders wording redundant and an interpretation that requires the court to omit what has been included in a statute, the court chooses the former
• considering whether carpet installers were independent contractors or \subject workers\ for whom business must pay workers compensation insurance
• when faced with the choice of an interpretation that renders other enactments redundant and an interpretation that requires the court to omit what the legislature has inserted into a statute, court chooses the former
• when presented with the choice of an interpretation that rendered other enactments redundant and an interpretation that required the court to, in effect, nullify statutory wording, court chose the former

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).