Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Second Circuit· 12/9/2009

Sacirbey v. Guccione

Citations

  • 589 F.3d 52
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26848
  • 2009 WL 4640628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that extradition could not proceed because Requesting State had — instead of providing “the arrest warrant” — produced merely a letter asserting intent to prosecute
  • observing that courts should “give[ ] meaning to treaty language ... while avoiding unwarranted incursions into the details of foreign criminal procedure.”
  • observing that courts should “give[] meaning to treaty language . . . while avoiding unwarranted incursions into the details of foreign criminal procedure.”
  • where treaty required “a duly authenticated copy of the warrant of arrest,” habeas court found implied condition that issuing No. 18-2723 13 court remain able to enforce it
  • where treaty required “a duly authenticated copy of the warrant of arrest,” habeas court found implied condition that issuing No. 18-2723 13 court remain able to enforce it
  • \[W]e interpret these provisions to mean that the proof required under the Treaty to establish that an individual has been 'charged' with a crime is a valid arrest warrant and the evidence submitted in - 51 - order to obtain that warrant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Leval, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sacirbey v. Guccione

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.