Sacirbey v. Guccione

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that extradition could not proceed because Requesting State had — instead of providing “the arrest warrant” — produced merely a letter asserting intent to prosecute
• observing that courts should “give[ ] meaning to treaty language ... while avoiding unwarranted incursions into the details of foreign criminal procedure.”
• observing that courts should “give[] meaning to treaty language . . . while avoiding unwarranted incursions into the details of foreign criminal procedure.”
• where treaty required “a duly authenticated copy of the warrant of arrest,” habeas court found implied condition that issuing No. 18-2723 13 court remain able to enforce it
• where treaty required “a duly authenticated copy of the warrant of arrest,” habeas court found implied condition that issuing No. 18-2723 13 court remain able to enforce it
• \[W]e interpret these provisions to mean that the proof required under the Treaty to establish that an individual has been 'charged' with a crime is a valid arrest warrant and the evidence submitted in - 51 - order to obtain that warrant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Sacirbey v. Guccione

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Sacirbey v. Guccione
  Second Circuit· 2009-12-09