Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts should avoid readings that “render statutory language surplusage”
• stating that courts should avoid readings that \render statutory language surplusage\
• stating that courts should avoid readings that “render statutory language surplusage”
• “ensuring the stability of the South Korean banking system” is a “public function” supporting a finding that the KDIC is an organ of the Korean government
• rejecting plaintiffs’ proposed construction of FSIA under antisurplusage canon because it would equate “foreign state” with “political subdivision,” whereas statute repeatedly employs those terms in the disjunctive
• rejecting plaintiffs’ proposed construction of FSIA under antisurplusage canon because it would equate “foreign state” with “political subdivision,” whereas statute repeatedly employs those terms in the disjunctive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).