Second Circuit· 11/27/2006
Armstrong v. Guccione
Citations
- 470 F.3d 89
- 2006 WL 3404803
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “a federal district court has the inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute”
- noting that “‘a federal district court has the inherent power to dismiss a case swa sponte for failure to prosecute”
- noting that “a federal district court has the inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute” (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-32 (1962))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leval, Sotomayor, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Second Circuit· 2010-08-25· cited 511×
- Xiao Xing Ni v. GonzalesSecond Circuit· 2007-07-12· cited 358×
- ACUMED LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc.Third Circuit· 2009-03-20· cited 337×
- Tian Ming Lin v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, 1Second Circuit· 2007-01-05· cited 55×
- El-Dehdan v. El-DehdanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-12-18· cited 48×
- Ashmore v. Cgi Grp., Inc.Second Circuit· 2019-05-08· cited 41×
- Ligon ex rel. J.G. v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2013-11-13· cited 30×
- United States v. HarrisThird Circuit· 2009-09-23· cited 29×
- Sacirbey v. GuccioneSecond Circuit· 2009-12-09· cited 29×
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGFirst Circuit· 2016-05-06· cited 19×
- In re Motion of District Judge - Ligon Floyd v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2013-11-13· cited 6×
- United States v. Thomas ThompsonSixth Circuit· 2019-05-29· cited 5×
- In re the Grand Jury Empaneled on May 9, 2014Third Circuit· 2015-05-15· cited 4×
- Armstrong v. GrondolskyThird Circuit· 2009-08-06· cited 4×
- United States v. LewisS.D. New York· 2014-03-20· cited 3×
- Armstrong v. LappinDistrict of Columbia· 2009-07-02· cited 2×
- United States v. RinehartW.D. Oklahoma· 2008-01-25· cited 1×
- Condon v. Inter-Religious Foundation for Community Organization, Inc.New York Supreme Court· 2008-01-11· cited 1×
- Mattina v. Kingsbridge Heights Rehabilitation & Care CenterSecond Circuit· 2009-05-18· cited 1×
- Armstrong v. GuccioneSecond Circuit· 2006-11-27
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 14,398×
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court· 1980-06-23· cited 2,455×
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 1,831×
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 1,809×
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 1,284×
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 1,242×
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court· 1944-02-28· cited 1,232×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 848×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1944-06-12· cited 772×
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court· 1812-03-14· cited 761×
- In Re DebsSupreme Court· 1895-05-27· cited 761×
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 677×
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court· 1948-02-09· cited 646×
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 498×
- United States v. HubbellSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 375×
- Curcio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-10· cited 349×
- Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 345×
Other cases named Armstrong v. Guccione
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.