In the Matter of Jan Alf Assarsson, Relator-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that treaty requirement that individual be \charged\ was \used in the generic sense only to indicate 'accused'\
• considering whether bilateral treaty required formal charges in requesting country was second category issue, whether request met treaty requirements
• stating that in reviewing a habeas decision in an extradition case, the court conducts a limited review of “those conditions [that] preclude extradition for offenses [that] are otherwise extraditable,” but that “[a]ny such conditions must come from the treaty itself”
• considering whether bilateral treaty required formal charges in requesting country was second category issue, whether request met treaty requirements
• considering whether bilateral treaty required formal charges in requesting country was second category issue, whether request met treaty requirements
• finding formal “charge” under Swedish criminal code not required for extradition when treaty language included extradition for “person[s] charged with or convicted of” listed offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).