Sable v. Southmark/Envicon Capital Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he [district [c]ourt has no obligation to create, unaided by plaintiff, new legal theories to support a complaint”
• “The naked assertion of concealment of material facts[,] which is contradicted by published documents which expressly set forth the very facts allegedly concealed[,] is insufficient to constitute actionable fraud.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).