United States v. Carlos Bienuenido Cruz, Roberto Cruz, Stephen Cruz, Teresa Irwin, Phillip Warren Jones, Dave Thomas, and Arthur Liggins Strong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that statements by third party on tape recorded conversation should be excluded wholesale as hearsay and noting that “the jury needed to hear them to give context to [d]efendant’s responses”
• “ ‘The [JDA] does not, of course, prevent an adult criminal defendant from being tried as an adult simply because he first became embroiled in the conspiracy with which he is charged while still a minor.’ ” (ellipsis omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).