Ninth Circuit· 8/4/2011
Russell Johnson, Iii v. Lucent Technologies Inc.
Citations
- 653 F.3d 1000
- 25 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 7
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16100
- 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,251
- 112 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1549
- 2011 WL 3332368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Conclusory allegations and unwarranted inferences . . . are insufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Reinhardt, Wardlaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- P. Victor Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of LaNinth Circuit· 2014-07-22· cited 151×
- Oklevueha Native American Church of Hawaii, Inc. v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2012-04-09· cited 81×
- Morgan v. Federal Express Corp.S.D. Texas· 2015-07-10· cited 68×
- Strategic Diversity, Inc. v. Alchemix CorporationNinth Circuit· 2012-01-20· cited 25×
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNinth Circuit· 2017-02-02· cited 23×
- Hitoshi Yoshikawa v. Troy SeguirantNinth Circuit· 2023-07-25· cited 22×
- Caitlin Ahearn v. Hyundai Motor AmericaNinth Circuit· 2018-01-23· cited 21×
- Nicdao v. Chase Home FinanceD. Alaska· 2012-03-13· cited 14×
- Mendia v. GarciaN.D. California· 2016-02-26· cited 10×
- Groves v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc.N.D. California· 2014-03-24· cited 7×
- Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, LLCN.D. California· 2014-09-09· cited 7×
- Adams v. Committee on Judicial Conduct & DisabilityN.D. California· 2016-02-25· cited 6×
- In re Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. Securities LitigationN.D. California· 2014-03-26· cited 5×
- Paul Grondal v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2022-06-13· cited 4×
- Heldt v. Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.N.D. California· 2015-09-18· cited 3×
- City of Miami Gen. Employees' & Sanitation Employees' Ret. Trust v. RH, Inc.N.D. California· 2018-02-26· cited 3×
- Hatamian v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-03-31· cited 1×
- Corales v. Flagstar Bank, FSBW.D. Washington· 2011-10-14· cited 1×
- Strategic Diversity, Inc. v. Alchemix CorporationNinth Circuit· 2011-12-02
- OKLEVUEHA NATIVE AMERICAN CHURCH v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2012-04-09
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Hebbe v. PlilerNinth Circuit· 2010-07-29· cited 4,042×
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 2,939×
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 2,518×
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court· 1980-12-15· cited 2,132×
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2005-01-04· cited 1,134×
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court· 2004-05-03· cited 958×
- CBOCS West, Inc. v. HumphriesSupreme Court· 2008-05-27· cited 807×
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 786×
- Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-12-15· cited 759×
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-02-23· cited 607×
- Reddy v. Litton Industries, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1990-08-16· cited 420×
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court· 1972-05-10· cited 404×
- Lukovsky v. City and County of San FranciscoNinth Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 379×
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 364×
- Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationNinth Circuit· 1987-04-28· cited 349×
- Sanders v. BrownNinth Circuit· 2007-09-26· cited 322×
- Bills v. ClarkNinth Circuit· 2010-12-08· cited 303×
- Brenda Dandy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2004-10-29· cited 209×
Other cases named Russell Johnson, Iii v. Lucent Technologies Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.