Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 7/29/2010

Hebbe v. Pliler

Citations

  • 627 F.3d 338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pro se complaints should continue to be liberally 27 construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
  • holding that pro se complaints should 21 continue to be liberally construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
  • holding that pro se complaints 7 should continue to be liberally construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
  • holding that pro se complaints should continue to be liberally 23 construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
  • holding that Iqbal did not alter the 12 “obligation” to construe pro se pleadings liberally
  • holding that pro se complaints 15 should continue to be liberally construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman, Nelson, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hebbe v. Pliler

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.