Sanders v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a price-posting scheme “necessarily involves a delegation of market power to private parties that is per se illegal under the Sherman Act”
• noting that a price-posting scheme “necessarily involves a delegation of market power to private parties that is per se illegal under the Sherman Act”
• noting that a price-posting scheme “necessarily involves a delegation of market power to private parties that is per se illegal under the Sherman Act”
• noting that a priceposting scheme \necessarily involves a delegation of market power to private parties that is per se illegal under the Sherman Act\
• finding no per se violation under Rice but addressing Parker state-action immunity through a discussion of cases generally associated with the hybrid restraint analysis
• finding no per se violation under Rice but addressing Parker state-action immunity through a discussion of cases generally associated with the hybrid restraint analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).