Skip to main content

Ruprecht v. Ruprecht

Citations

  • 599 A.2d 604
  • 252 N.J. Super. 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that wife's eleven year secret adulterous affair with her employer failed \to reach the level of outrageousness necessary for liability under this tort.\
  • allegation that wife had engaged in adulterous affair for last eleven years of parties’ marriage does not state a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress
  • “Can one spouse sue the other for . . . [IIED] in absence of physical injury in a divorce action? There is no doubt that one spouse can sue the other for an intentional tort causing personal injury and the damage that ensues therefrom.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pisansky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.