Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 6/29/1998
Doe v. Doe
Citations
- 712 A.2d 132
- 122 Md. App. 295
- 1998 Md. App. LEXIS 129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing interspousal tort claims for negligence and intentional tort claims arising out of misrepresentation of paternity, noting that because interspousal immunity is no longer recognized, torts not otherwise abrogated should be available to spouses
- allowing interspousal tort claims for negligence and intentional tort claims arising out of misrepresentation of paternity, noting that because interspousal immunity is no longer recognized, torts not otherwise abrogated should be available to spouses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrell, Thieme and Kenney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bozman v. BozmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-08-12· cited 43×
- Doe v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-07· cited 35×
- G.A.W. v. D.M.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-07-13· cited 28×
- Catholic University of America v. Bragunier Masonry Contractors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-03· cited 17×
- Day v. HellerNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-11-22· cited 13×
- C.M. v. J.M.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-01-05· cited 5×
- Bozman v. BozmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-04· cited 4×
- Gaw v. DmwCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-07-13
- Cm v. JmNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-01-05
Cites
57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court· 1993-05-05· cited 701×
- Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-12-09· cited 400×
- Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-12· cited 236×
- Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-03-22· cited 219×
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1998-03-24· cited 214×
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1910-12-12· cited 202×
- Tevis v. TevisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-04-05· cited 146×
- Merenoff v. MerenoffSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-06-01· cited 133×
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-22· cited 132×
- White v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-11-11· cited 130×
- B.N. v. K.KCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-29· cited 124×
- Figueiredo-Torres v. NickelCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-21· cited 123×
- Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-01-11· cited 119×
- Harper v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-23· cited 106×
- Pavel Enterprises, Inc. v. AS Johnson Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-10· cited 100×
- Hrehorovich v. Harbor Hospital Center, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-30· cited 96×
- Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-06-30· cited 95×
- Vance v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-01-09· cited 92×
- Lewis v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-07-09· cited 86×
- Ruth v. FletcherSupreme Court of Virginia· 1989-03-03· cited 85×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.