Hume v. Bayer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[plaintiff] was not examined by a physician or psychiatrist to treat his alleged condition, and there is simply no evidence supporting his claim.”
• parents of boy with mildly infected appendix could recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress resulting from being told, knowingly and maliciously, that condition was cancerous
• intentionally telling parents that child’s medical condition much worse than it was

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).