Strauss v. Cilek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “defendant’s conduct in participating in a [consensual] sexual relationship with ... his friend’s wife . . . over an extended period, is [not] atrocious”
• fraud and adultery did not reach the status of outrageous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).