Runsvold v. Idaho State Bar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney reprimanded because Idaho's version of RPC 4.2(a) \applies to prevent the pro se attorney from directly contacting a represented opposing party\
• attorney reprimanded because Idaho’s version of RPC 4.2(a) “applies to prevent the pro se attorney from directly contacting a represented opposing party”
• “We thus construe the phrase of Rule 4.2, ‘in representing a client’ to include the situation in which an attorney is acting pro se because this interpretation better effectuates the purpose of Rule 4.2.”
• “We thus construe the phrase of Rule 4.2, ‘in representing a client’ to include the situation in which an attorney is acting pro se because this interpretation better effectuates the purpose of Rule 4.2.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).