Dawson v. CHEYOVICH FAMILY TRUST

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the case may constitute unique and compelling circumstances justifying relief under Rule 60(b)(6
• observing that the case may constitute unique and compelling circumstances justifying relief under Rule 60(b)(6
• observing that the case may constitute unique and compelling circumstances justifying relief under Rule 60(b)(6) when plaintiff’s complaint only pleaded an entitlement to a one-fourth interest in real property but district court’s order quieted title to entire property in plaintiff
• “[I]f [an] issue is only mentioned in passing and not supported by any cogent argument or authority, it cannot be considered by this Court.”
• “[I]f [an] issue is only mentioned in passing and not supported by any cogent argument or authority, it cannot be considered by this Court.”
• “Regardless of whether an issue is explicitly set forth in the party’s brief as one of the issues on appeal, if the issue is only mentioned in passing and not supported by any cogent argument or authority, it cannot be considered by this Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).